Rock Art Database

NORTH MAINS, STRATHALLAN

View PDF
Canmore ID 26005 SCRAP ID 24
Location OS Grid Ref: NN 92600 16200 Team Not in team
Existing Classifications
Classification Period
CUP MARKED STONE PREHISTORIC
UNIDENTIFIED POTTERY NEOLITHIC
BARROW PREHISTORIC
Date Fieldwork Started 29/10/2018 Date Fieldwork Completed
New Panel? No  

Section A. CORE INFORMATION

A1. Identifiers

Panel Name NORTH MAINS, STRATHALLAN Number
Other names
HER/SMR SM Number Other
Classifications And Periods
Classification 1 Cup Marked Stone Period 1 Neol/bronze Age
County
PERTHSHIRE

A2. Grid Reference(original find site)

OS NGR NN 92600 16200
New OS NGR
Lat/Long 56.32596 -3.73833
Obtained By:

A3. Current Location & Provenance

Located
  • Moved from original location
  • In museum
  • From excavation
Museum/Collection National Museum of Rural Life, Wester Kittochside Farm
Accession no. Not given

Section B. CONTEXT

B1. Landscape Context

Weather
Position in landscape
Topography(terrain within about 500m of panel.)
Aspect of slope (if on sloping terrain e.g. S, SE etc.)

B2. Current land use & vegetation

  • No selection

B3. Forestry

  • No selection

B4. Archaeological Features within 200m / or visible from the panel

  • No selection

B5. Location Notes

This panel is displayed at the entrance to the Science Gallery in the National Museum of Rural Life, Wester Kittochside Farm, East Kilbride. It came from the site of North Mains, Strathallan, Perthshire excavated by Dr Gordon J Barclay et al in 1979. This extensive complex comprised a round barrow and a class II henge. The panel was associated with the barrow (Barclay, G.J. 1984. Sites of the third millennium bc to the first millennium ad at North Mains, Strathallan, Perthshire, Proc Soc Antiq Scot 113 (1983): 189-192, with an image of the slab as found in Plate 15).

Previous Notes

This round barrow was excavated by G Barclay in 1978-9 in advance of development. It covered a well-preserved old land surface corrugated by spaded ridges. A roughly circular timber enclosure 7.5m in diameter had been erected on the old land surface. It contained a flint arrowhead, but no trace of burials; this absence may be illusory in view of the high acidity of the soil. A number of light wooden fences was built radiating from the enclosure forming bays into which was dumped material dug from the surrounding quarry ditch. The central enclosure was filled with boulders. The pattern of construction established by the fences and the wall of the central enclosure was maintained to the top of the mound. The barrow was capped by a layer of turf and ultimately a layer of stones, giving it the appearance of a cairn. Two food vessels, a number of cremation deposits, and two probable inhumations had been inserted in the mound. Radiocarbon dates suggest the mound was built in the early 2nd millenium BC. G Barclay 1978.

NN91NW 17 9262 1621 For adjacent henge (also excavated), see NN91NW 18. At NN 9262 1621, on level ground at the junction of the River Earn and the Machany Water, there is a tree-covered cairn measuring 44.0m in diameter and 4.0m in height, though a stone dyke encroaches on its N side. There are traces of a ditch round the NW side. An excavation in the top shows the cairn to be composed mainly of large, waterworn stones with an admixture of earth. On the edge of the excavation there are two large stone slabs, on one of which, measuring 1.6m by 1.1m by 0.3m, are some thirty cup marks, the majority very small, but some averaging 2ins in diameter and 1/2ins deep. Surveyed at 1:2500. Visited by OS (W D J) 30 May 1967. (NN 9262 1621) Cairn (NR) Cup marked Stone (NR) OS 1:10,000 map, (1975) This round barrow was excavated by G Barclay in 1978-9 in advance of development. It covered a well-preserved old land surface corrugated by spaded ridges. A roughly circular timber enclosure 7.5m in diameter had been erected on the old land surface. It contained a flint arrowhead, but no trace of burials; this absence may be illusory in view of the high acidity of the soil. A number of light wooden fences was built radiating from the enclosure forming bays into which was dumped material dug from the surrounding quarry ditch. The central enclosure was filled with boulders. The pattern of construction established by the fences and the wall of the central enclosure was maintained to the top of the mound. The barrow was capped by a layer of turf and ultimately a layer of stones, giving it the appearance of a cairn. Two food vessels, a number of cremation deposits, and two probable inhumations had been inserted in the mound. Radiocarbon dates suggest the mound was built in the early 2nd millenium BC. G Barclay 1978. CUCAP photographs of 29 July 1979 show barrow under excavation. (Undated) information in NMRS.

Section C. PANEL

C1. Panel Type

In a structure Burial monument

C2. Panel Dimensions, Slope & Orientation

Dimensions of panel (m to one decimal place)
Length (longer axis) 2.1 Width 1.6
Height (max) 0.3 Height (min) 0.3
Approximate slope of carved surface
degrees degrees
Orientation (Aspect e.g. NW)
Rock Surface Carved Surface Carved Surface

C3. Rock Surface

Surface Compactness Hard Grain Size Fine Visible Anomalies Not Visible
Rock Type Not Sure

C4. Surface Features

  • Bedding Planes
  • Smooth Surface

C5. Panel Notes

This is a large, thin slab measuring approximately 2.1 x 1.6m maximum and 0.3m thick. It is currently mounted on a plinth where the public can both see and touch it. Its decorated front surface is smooth and flat, whereas the rear surface is fractured and rough where is was cut during removal, either in antiquity or at the time of excavation. The excavation report (Barclay 1984, p.189) notes that: 'In the shallow pit dug in 1957 a large cupmarked slab was found lying decorated face down, apparently, left in the condition after the earlier undated disturbance. After the 1957 excavation the slab was left lying decorated face upwards at the edge of the pit. There were about 30 complete or unfinished cupmarks on one surface. In addition there were a number of groups of peck-marks, perhaps the beginnings of cupmarks. The stone was severely damaged some months after the completion of the excavation and has since been removed by SDD (Ancient Monuments) to a place of safety. Any evidence of a relationship between the cupmarked slab, burial K and the stone capping of the mound was destroyed by the earlier excavations.' The damage is clearly visible when comparing Plate 15 from Barclay's report with the current stone. At least 5 prominent cupmarks on the panel's upper edge (four of which were arranged in a diamond shape) are now missing. Recording by ACFA Team South identified 12 probable cupmarks, 3 of which are truncated by the damage to the panel, as well as some of the 'unfinished cupmarks' referred to in the report.

C6. Probability

The probability that there is any rock art on the panel is Definite

Comments

No comments added

C7. MOTIFS

Cupmark
cupmark_1
12

Visible Tool Marks? No

Visible Peck Marks? Yes

Section D. ACCESS, AWARENESS & RISK

D1. Access

  • Access is managed by a national organisation.
  • There is and interpretation on site.

D2. Awareness

  • Panel was known before the project.
There are stories or folk traditions associated with this panel No

D3. Risk

Natural
  • No selection
Animal
Human
  • The rock is in an area with visitor facilities.
Comments and other potential threats

No comments added